OPT

In: Blog

20 Sep 2009

First up is OPT. The Optimum Performance Training blog is run by James Fitzgerald, former Crossfit Games Champion, and consistently high performer in the Crossfit community. James takes a different approach to training others than most Crossfit gyms. Each of his clients have met with him individually for both a performance assessment as well as a Biofeedback reading. He also sends them to a local Homeopath for further evaluation. He does this in order to individualize each program he writes. His clients usually train on their own with periodic technique sessions with James and his trainers. These sessions are focused on correcting positions in the lifts and focusing more on the basics than getting an actual workout. He claims that individualizing Crossfit programming is a higher order Crossfit Methodology.

His blog is a more generalized approach to this method. James analyzes the performance of his “Big Dawgs” and adjusts his programming accordingly. His program changes as the user changes. So for those of you that follow James programming and aren’t posting times, you aren’t getting necessarily what you need. By keeping a close eye on the Big Dawgs performance, james can keep each and everyone of them progressing at the same rate. It seems to me that he is focused on the GPP side of crossfit with the realization that workouts don’t have to take 30 minutes to get results (in fact, they don’t even have to take 20…) and it is important to be both strong with weights and be able to move your body under control.

After a little prodding i got some trends that he sees in Crossfitters as a whole (actually more like the people he trains but i think they are global trends), and they are the same that i have seen.
Number one is that they are weak in the olympic lifts, both in technique and in strength. In my opinion that means there needs to be a focus on them.
Number two is the lack of competence in the basic gymnastics movements. James mentioned to me that he is taking his training more towards a strict gymnastic bias. To me that means he is focused on building a strong foundation before he jumps back into super high intensity. He is ok with sacrificing his time to make himself better. I say he is a wise man for doing so.

I like his nutritional info posted daily. It is a bit over my head but he has a reason behind the madness and i think its pretty legit.

Would i do these workouts?
No doubt, but there are some things that i would make sure. I would call or email james and let him know who i was and what i was looking for out of his workouts. Let him know my goals and get some feedback from him on his purpose over the next couple months. I would then make sure that i posted everything i did on his blog so he has his finger on my pulse at all times. I trust his judgment as a trainer so i would have no problem committing to his program.

15 Responses to OPT

Avatar

Jason

September 20th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

Dutch,
In this post and several others you have mentioned that a general trend is weakness in the olympic lifts. What kind of benchmarks would you consider as being weak or not weak in the o-lifts. I am by no means a stellar olympic lifter but I feel pretty good about my pr’s in relation to bodyweight. C&J = 150% BW (140), Snatch = Just over 100% BW. Also, great write-up on OPT.

Avatar

John Frazer

September 21st, 2009 at 4:44 am

This series is a great idea and I look forward to future installments. Crossfit is entering a period where I think a lot of theoretical arguments will get sorted out in practice.

I haven’t tried the OPT workouts but from looking at them, have no doubt they’d be effective.

Looking at them through the eyes of a person trying to pick a program, I like the fact that weights are keyed to previous performance (percentage of 1RM). I also like the post-WOD nutritional suggestions.

Through those same eyes, scheduling the two-a-day workouts could be tough for a person whose schedule is busy with job, family, etc.

My other comment is that the exercise notations could use a glossary or FAQ. Looking at the blog comments, it seems that the tempo specifications and set/rep schemes cause some confusion among athletes following along online.

Avatar

Dutch

September 22nd, 2009 at 8:48 am

Jason,
A good way to figure out where you stand is to check USAW for what people are doing in your weight class.
If you look at those number relative to crossfitters you will not have a good handle on what your potential is.
I would like to see everyone snatch 100kg and clean and jerk 130.

Avatar

Dave

September 22nd, 2009 at 11:50 am

I would like to see me snatch and c&j those numbers too!

Avatar

Russ Greene

September 22nd, 2009 at 8:16 pm

It’s true that Crossfitters are weak olympic lifters compared to specialists at olympic lifting. The same holds true for Crossfiters’ gymnastics abilities, as you noticed, and their 100m,200m,400m,800m, mile, and 5k run times. Then why focus specifically on olympic lifting?

Why not design training with the goal of improving running at all distances, olympic lifting, slow lifts, and gymnastics all at the same time? If you say it can’t be done, then why have I and my athletes consistently done this with Crossfit programming for years?

Obviously 20 and 30 minute workouts aren’t for every day, but OPT does program them in regularly. How else can you claim to improve fitness across broad time domains?

You can’t claim you’re developing broad and inclusive fitness but never train long workouts.

Moe Kelsey regularly competes in triathlons and Mikko Salo trains 3 metcons per day, including long ones. Those guys seem to be doing fine for themselves fitness-wise, including strength and power.

Avatar

Jason

September 22nd, 2009 at 8:17 pm

At this point those seem like pretty big numbers. Right now I have my goals set at 160lb snatch & 225lb C&J.

Avatar

Dutch

September 22nd, 2009 at 8:29 pm

Russ,
I’m not sure where you get your info. I never said quit doing anything.
Nor did I say broad general and inclusive fitness is unattainable. Please explain yourself as I am thouroughly confused by your comment.
Dutch

Avatar

Russ Greene

September 22nd, 2009 at 10:26 pm

“To be quite honest i don’t see any need to change what i have been doing. If i were to compete next year i would continue what i did before the 09 games. That boils down to weightlifting followed by metcon between 2 and 15 minutes. Yes thats what i enjoy but also what i feel will build the best all around fitness in the shortest amount of time.”

“If we were to take on a true GPP program there would not be any improvement in any of the 10 general physical skills.”

Avatar

Russ Greene

September 22nd, 2009 at 10:51 pm

“If your sport is Crossfit, there is no place for 35 minute workouts.”

- from your comment at http://www.dutchlowy.com/2009/04/29/bad-workout/#comments

Avatar

dutch

September 24th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

Russ,
I am sorry my friend, i just don’t understand what you are arguing.

My comment above clearly states:
That boils down to weightlifting followed by metcon between 2 and 15 minutes. Yes thats what i enjoy but also what i feel will build the best all around fitness in the shortest amount of time.”

The important part there is best fitness in shortest time.
I continue to stand behind my other comments. even though you pulled them completely out of context.

Avatar

Russ Greene

September 24th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

Maybe I didn’t correctly understand your points.

Please clarify your positions on these matters:

Should those pursuing Crossfit and GPP regularly train long workouts (20-30 minutes and up)?

If so, you have stated that if you’re pacing yourself, you’re not improving your fitness. How do you square that with the need to pace oneself in longer workouts? You don’t sprint the first 400 of a 10k run or the first round of a 10 round WOD, do you?

More broadly, is it possible to improve all aspects of GPP at once?

Lastly, why should Crossfitters focus on olympic lifting if they are also deficient at gymnastics, running, and all three energy systems? Why focus on one particular mode of Crossfit in one particular time domain and thus energy system?

Avatar

dutch

September 24th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

Russ,
This is gonna be long. I’m gonna make it a post.
cool?

Avatar

Russ Greene

September 24th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

Yeah man. I look forward to it.

Avatar

Dave C

September 26th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

Hey Dutch, thanks for the great writeup on OPT’s stuff. I have to admit, the first few times on his blog made me feel pretty ignorant. The entries written right after the CF Games really helped me figure out his programming dynamic. I would really like to try the OPT programming for a couple months, but it is a pretty tough schedule for me to accomplish, logistics-wise. I may give it a shot a couple months before the 2010 Florida Sectionals, or whatever they are going to call it (dirty South pre-quals).

Anyways, this article was a good one for me, and I can’t wait to see your other stuff.

Avatar

Get Learned | CrossFit Toronto

September 30th, 2009 at 1:02 am

[...] OPT [...]

Comment Form

Email Subscribe

Interested in hearing about upcoming events and more?

E-mail:

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Dutch Lowy Training Seminar DVD


Join Dutch Lowy of CrossFit ATM as he outlines clear guidelines for maximizing the effectiveness of CrossFit training, improving the structure of your training program, and building community in your gym.

Represent Dutch!

use the code below to embed this widget on your website!

  • Josh: I used to be a CF junkie back in high school. Last year switched to CFSB program, SS, then to full w [...]
  • Ability - Dutch Lowy: [...] have talked alot about giving you and your athletes tools to get better rather than just servi [...]
  • Dutch: Nigel, I think 3 x/week would be sufficient to maintain while you are lifting. I would lean towar [...]